Antwort Is it worth it to watch The Hobbit? Weitere Antworten – Is The Hobbit worth it
The films are overextended-especially action scenes-and the Hobbit text gets mangled. But the films work well enough on their own terms and as preludes to the better LOTR that they are worth owning. This is in large part because the formal elements of filmmaking-but in particular the design work-are all top notch.It has 20 minutes of additional footage added back into the film (bringing its total running time up to 164 minutes), as well as multiple documentaries about the making of the film as supplements.This is because although “The Hobbit” movies came out 10 years after “The Lord of the Rings” movies, “Hobbit” films take place earlier. So, chronologically, you should watch “The Hobbit” trilogy first. There is no harm, though, in choosing to watch the movies in release order.
Which is better Harry Potter or Hobbit : It depends. The first five books of Harry Potter are almost as good as the Hobbit in terms of readability, and give much better character sketches and descriptions. It's very close each having their own strengths and weaknesses.
Who killed Smaug
Bard the Bowman
The townsmen's arrows and spears proved useless against the dragon's armoured body. The thrush told Bard the Bowman of Smaug's one weak spot, a bare patch on the dragon's belly. With his last arrow, Bard killed Smaug by shooting into this place.
Is The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies the last one : The sequel to 2013's The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, it is the final instalment in The Hobbit trilogy, acting as a prequel to Jackson's The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
The rushed production of The Hobbit led to a lack of pre-production time, resulting in a less cohesive creative process. The overuse of CGI, added material, and lack of memorable villains contributed to The Hobbit's failure to make a lasting impact.
The Lord of the Rings movies are the main course, and The Hobbit is a side dish you didn't really touch but you can eat if you force yourself. If I'm being completely honest, my recommendation would be to watch The Lord of the Rings movies and then to skip The Hobbit trilogy. Read the book instead.
Is LOTR or Hobbit better
More broadly speaking, the Hobbit films just aren't nearly as good as The Lord of the Rings. While there are certainly great aspects about the films, such as the excellent cast, the trilogy as a whole fails to leave the same kind of impact on the viewer as its predecessor.Top of the list of fantasy books better than Harry Potter is of course the Percy Jackson and the Olympians by Rick Riordan. These books have better charcaters, more exciting worldbuilding, and the scope is massive, setting up some great spin-off series that are also worth reading.The whole reason why Gandalf got the dwarves and Bilbo on their mission to Erebor was because he feared an alliance between Sauron and Smaug. While it was unlikely that the dragon would serve Sauron, a collaboration was more than possible in Gandalf's mind (and his mind tended to be spot on).
The Hobbit dragon is the most famous of Tolkien's dragons. The name Smaug, is derived from a Germanic word that means "to squeeze through a hole." He is a large red dragon, and the considered the last 'great' dragon of the Third Age. He is evil and very strong, as evidenced by his ability to conquer two cities.
Should I watch Hobbit or LOTR first : This is because although “The Hobbit” movies came out 10 years after “The Lord of the Rings” movies, “Hobbit” films take place earlier. So, chronologically, you should watch “The Hobbit” trilogy first. There is no harm, though, in choosing to watch the movies in release order.
Why did Thorin go mad : Why did Thorin go crazy Thorin fell victim to the sickness of greed. Dwarves are known for being greedy and proud, and when he realized the treasure of Erebor was his, including the Arkenstone, he became ill with Dragon Sickness. He began to value his wealth more than his friends, family, and own safety.
Why is The Hobbit so special
Hobbits are special precisely because, in many ways, they are not. Hobbits do not have magical powers, or incredible strength, or the wisdom of ages. And they're fine with that. They alone, among the other races of Middle-Earth, do not seek power or control or dangerous knowledge, for good or for evil.
This is because although “The Hobbit” movies came out 10 years after “The Lord of the Rings” movies, “Hobbit” films take place earlier. So, chronologically, you should watch “The Hobbit” trilogy first. There is no harm, though, in choosing to watch the movies in release order.Is it necessary to read "The Hobbit" before "Lord of the Rings" or can it be read as a standalone book The Lord of the Ring starts off with a recap of the events of The Hobbit – you don't need to have read The Hobbit, but you really should anyway.
Should I watch Hobbit or Lord first : Each trilogy's order is simple on its own, but things can get confusing when watching all six movies together. This is because although “The Hobbit” movies came out 10 years after “The Lord of the Rings” movies, “Hobbit” films take place earlier. So, chronologically, you should watch “The Hobbit” trilogy first.