Antwort Should you start with Hobbit or Lord of the Rings? Weitere Antworten – Is it better to start with Lord of the Rings or The Hobbit

Should you start with Hobbit or Lord of the Rings?
I would suggest starting with LOTR or possibly with the Hobbit for younger people. LOTR is the most complete story in the cannon. The hobbit is a good story but suffers slightly from its start which does not fit into the world of LOTR very well.We recommend starting your adventure with The Hobbit, Tolkien's first published foray into Middle-earth, before moving onto The Lord of the Rings proper. The Hobbit is a rollicking good read, and a superb place to get your feet wet.Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit films in chronological order

  1. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.
  2. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.
  3. The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies.
  4. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
  5. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.
  6. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

Is The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit connected : The Hobbit series was released a decade after The Lord of the Rings trilogy but serves as its prequel within the story chronology. The films are based on the 1937 novel The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien and follow the adventures of Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), Frodo's uncle.

Should I start with The Hobbit movie

And a Chronological Order

Switch the two trilogies so all The Hobbit movies go first, and, if you wanted to include The Rings of Power, pop that on before anything else. Your viewing order would look like this: Lord of the Rings The Rings of Power (2022) The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)

Is The Hobbit hard to read : The Hobbit was written before Tolkien's ambitious Lord of the Rings. While there are many references to classic lore, the bottom line is that this is a YA book. It is easy to read, and to read aloud, (something that is not the case with LOTR.

Which order should I read Tolkien's Middle-earth books in

  • The Hobbit.
  • The Lord of the Rings.
  • The Adventures of Tom Bombadil and Other Verses from the Red Book.
  • The Silmarillion.
  • Unfinished Tales.
  • The History of Middle-earth series.
  • The Children of Húrin.
  • Beren and Lúthien.


The overall plot is straightforward but filled with many sub-adventures. Although the beginning is a bit slow, especially for younger readers, as soon as the adventure truly begins (about 40 pages in) the story moves quickly. The characters are certainly different from those in the average modern children's book.

Which Hobbit to watch first

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)

Chronologically, the story kicks off with 2012's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, which sees Martin Freeman take on the role of a younger Bilbo Baggins (played by Ian Holm in the LotR trilogy).A very simple answer is that the Hobbit was a short book turned into three movies, whereas the Lord of the Rings comes from 3 big books for a set of three movies… I would say so, but only slightly. The writing is more polished, the story easier to adapt, and less studio interference.If you enjoyed the LOTR trilogy, then Peter Jackson will have you in awe again, although The Hobbit trilogy looks set to be a much more relaxed and 'fun' adventure. At the end of the day, the only complain to be made about the movie is that it simply isn't LOTR.

Here is the first way: The Hobbit, then The Lord of the Rings trilogy, then The Adventures of Tom Bombadil (if you like poetry), The Silmarillion, The Great Tales Trilogy (which is three books, The Children of Hurin, Beren and Luthien), and finally Unfinished Tales.

Which Lord of the Rings to watch first : You can either watch the films in the order of their release, starting with 2001's “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring,” or you can watch the events as they actually unfold in Middle Earth, in which case you would start with Season 1 of Prime Video's “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power,” as the …

Why The Hobbit movies are better than LOTR : Despite their flaws, the “Hobbit” trilogy is better than the “LotR” trilogy. The main reason is because the characters are better adapted from the books. Martin Freeman was perfect as Bilbo; he feels like a faithful portrayal of Bilbo from the book.

Can a beginner read The Hobbit

The overall plot is straightforward but filled with many sub-adventures. Although the beginning is a bit slow, especially for younger readers, as soon as the adventure truly begins (about 40 pages in) the story moves quickly. The characters are certainly different from those in the average modern children's book.

LOTR is not a quick read. This story spans over 1,000 pages and contains a vast amount of detail. It is a book that demands your full attention, so take your time and read it at a pace that suits you. And don't speed read it–you will miss the intricate world-building, details, and nuances.I suggest reading the books first. The reason is that once you watch the movies your imagination will be restricted to what you experienced in the movie and will override your experience of the text. It will not necessarily degrade your reading of the book – but it will change your experience.

Should I read LOTR or Silmarillion first : Read the LOTR series first because it will give you something to refer to as your read the others. Paul Magnussen I agree with most of the other answers: Hobbit -> LoTR -> Silmarillion -> Unfinished Tales. Also: if you enjoyed reading the Appendices of LoTR, then you'll enjoy The Silmarillion.


Related Posts