Antwort Was Rome the greatest Empire? Weitere Antworten – Was Rome really the greatest empire

The Roman Empire is not considered the largest in history. Despite how extremely long it was active, its factors such as landmass and population are far outweighed by other empires.Rome became the most powerful state in the world by the first century BCE through a combination of military power, political flexibility, economic expansion, and more than a bit of good luck.chieftain Odoacer

The fall of Rome was completed in 476, when the German chieftain Odoacer deposed the last Roman emperor of the West, Romulus Augustulus. The East, always richer and stronger, continued as the Byzantine Empire through the European Middle Ages.

Was emperor at Rome’s greatest extent : emperor Trajan

The Roman Empire reached its greatest extent in 117 CE, under the emperor Trajan. When Trajan died, much of the territory he conquered in Mesopotamia was quickly lost, but from that point on, Rome's frontiers became relatively stable.

What is the greatest empire ever

the British Empire

In 1913, 412 million people lived under the control of the British Empire, 23 percent of the world's population at that time. It remains the largest empire in human history and at the peak of its power in 1920, it covered an astonishing 13.71 million square miles – that's close to a quarter of the world's land area.

What was the best empire ever :

• 1) British Empire (16th–20th centuries)
• 2) Mongol Empire (1206–1368)
• 3) Russian Empire (1721–1917)
• 4) Ottoman Empire (1299–1922)
• 5) Spanish Empire (15th–19th centuries)
• 6) Qing Dynasty (1644–1912)
• 7) Umayyad Caliphate (661–750)
• 8) Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258)

The opening action of the Cimbrian War, the Battle of Noreia in 112 BC, ended in defeat and near disaster for the Romans. In 105 BC the Romans were defeated at the Battle of Arausio and was the costliest Rome had suffered since the Battle of Cannae.

The Germanic king Odoacer defeated the Roman Empire in 476 AD. However, his invasion was simply the "straw that broke the camel's back". Rome had been in a state of decline for centuries and had suffered two previous sacks by Germanic tribes.

Was the Roman Empire too big

Their sheer size was a large part of why the Roman Empire collapsed, it simply became too big for its own good, making it hard to govern. It was the Western Roman Empire that fell first, the Eastern Roman Empire only following another 1000 years later.The Roman Empire is considered to have been the most enduring in history. The formal start date of the empire remains the subject of debate, but most historians agree that the clock began ticking in 27 BC, when the Roman politician Octavian overthrew the Roman Republic to become Emperor Augustus.The Mongol Empire(Genghiz Khan and the lot). Well everyone knows what they did. For the Central Asia region, they were equivalent to Hell and in their views, was the worst that could happen to them.

The Roman Empire gets a bad reputation for two major reasons: The Senate (which never accepted being sidelined by the Emperors) funded salacious stories about corruption and decadence in the imperial court. The Republic is often presented as the epitome of democracy, but was itself extremely corrupt.

What was the 2nd strongest empire in history : The British Empire (red) and Mongol Empire (blue) were the largest and second-largest empires in history, respectively. The precise extent of the Mongol Empire at its greatest territorial expansion is a matter of debate among scholars.

Could Rome have survived : However, most modern historians now believe that both individuals and social/cultural trends determine the course of human history. If the Roman Empire had had a seamless system to transfer power, it may well have been able to survive the social pressures of the ages and rule the western world into the present time.

Who was Rome’s first enemy

Carthage

The First Punic War pitted an aggressive Roman Republic against maritime giant Carthage.

However, most modern historians now believe that both individuals and social/cultural trends determine the course of human history. If the Roman Empire had had a seamless system to transfer power, it may well have been able to survive the social pressures of the ages and rule the western world into the present time.Its demise can be attributed to many factors, especially internal corruption, division, and outside invasion. As Rome grew in size and population, the rulers of Rome became very corrupt. Rather than serving the interests of the Empire, rulers, generals, and politicians became more concerned with protecting themselves.

What destroyed Rome : Invasions by Barbarian tribes

The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.